Angela Merkel has spoken, and Europe is paying attention. Yesterday, for the first time since stepping down, the former chancellor shared how her choices shaped Germany’s approach to Russia and Ukraine.
Sitting in her Berlin office, with maps of Eastern Europe on the walls, Merkel explained why Ukraine’s NATO membership was blocked in 2008.
She said it wasn’t just about rules but careful planning. “Vladimir Putin wouldn’t have stayed quiet,” she told the BBC, her voice firm, reflecting the long hours spent talking with him.
The relationship between Germany and Russia during Merkel’s leadership was complicated.
German businesses benefited from cheap energy, but Ukraine faced growing threats.
When Russia annexed Crimea and sent its Black Sea Fleet closer to Ukraine, Merkel had to balance sanctions with talks.
At EU meetings, I remember Eastern European diplomats warning about relying too much on Russian energy.
Poland and the Baltic countries strongly disagreed with Merkel’s approach. Still, Germany’s business needs won – until the full-scale invasion changed everything.
Now, with Ukrainian frontlines under constant attack and Europe’s security at risk, Merkel stands by her actions. She believes her way of mixing strong diplomacy with business ties delayed the war.
Meanwhile, German banks and firms struggle with high energy costs and a future without Russian gas.
From Kiev’s point of view, Merkel’s decision to block NATO membership left Ukraine vulnerable.
Defense spending in Europe stayed low while Moscow kept increasing its weapons.
The Alternative for Germany party has gained support by using people’s fears about the economy.
German firms, now facing huge energy costs, are questioning the years of focus on Moscow.
Looking at the situation today, Merkel shares honest advice on handling international challenges. Her experience, of leading Europe’s largest economy through crises, shows both the practical and personal sides of diplomacy.
Whether Merkel’s decisions on Russia and Ukraine will be seen as wise or a mistake is still unclear. But one thing is certain her choices continue to shape European politics, from Brussels to the battle lines in Eastern Europe.
